Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Ase Industries, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2007No. Docket 263930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWYER, PJ.

The primary issue presented for our consideration is whether a trial court is free to conclude that a defendant in a products-liability action had actual knowledge that the product was defective under MCL 600.2949a even if the jury has determined under MCL 600.2946a(3) that the defendant was not grossly negligent. We hold that the two determinations are independent and that a finding by the jury that there was no gross negligence does not preclude the trial court from concluding that the defendant had actual knowledge that the product was defective.

Plaintiff was seriously injured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Danse Corp. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. United States Fidelity Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Scott v. Illinois Tool Works, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Van Hook v. Harris Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yellowbird v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Genaw v. Garage Equipment Supply, INCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  3. Kaiser v. Jayco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API