Legal Opinion
POURSOHI v. BLINKEN
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 16, 2021No. 3:21-cv-01960Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SEYED AMIR SINA MIRMOTALEB Case No. 21-cv-01960-TSH POURSOHI, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 28, 30 ANTONY BLINKEN, 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Antony 15 Blinken (“Defendant”). ECF No. 24. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition (ECF No. 26), and Defendant 16 filed a Reply (ECF No. 27). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and 17 the record in this case,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Norse v. City of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.