Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Utter
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 19, 1902No. 388PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
186 U.S. 95 (1902)
MURPHY
v.
UTTER.
No. 388.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 7, 10 1902.
Decided May 19, 1902.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA.
Mr. Rochester Ford and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellants.
Mr. John F. Dillon for appellees.
2Opinion of the Court · BrownJustice Brown
While upon the former hearing of this case, under the name of Utter v. Franklin, 172 U.S. 416, the order of the Supreme Court of Arizona denying a writ of mandamus was reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings, we expressed the opinion "that it was made the duty of the Loan Commissioners by these acts to fund the bonds…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- People ex rel. Case v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by31 opinions
- Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Chase v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.