Legal Opinion
Durland v. Social Security Administration
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 30, 2020No. 6:19-cv-00167Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA KATHRYN ANNETTE ) DURLAND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-19-167-SPS ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, 1 ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER The claimant requests judicial review of a denial of benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). She appeals the Commissioner’s decision and asserts that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in determining she was not disabled. For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.