Gillilan v. Myers
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago. The pleadings and proofs in this ease are set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bbeese
This was an action of assumpsit brought by the appellee against the appellant in the Superior Court of Chicago. The declaration contained a count for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered, and the money counts. Issues were made up, a trial by jury was had, and a verdict for the appellee.
It is not material to examine the pleadings in the cause, as no question is made upon them. No exceptions were taken to the instructions, and the only question presented is, should the court have granted a new trial ?
This depends upon the evidence. To maintain the issue on the part of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Raborg v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Kelley v. HemmingwayIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by7 opinions
- Glidden v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Canadian Bank of Commerce v. McCreaIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Kingsbury v. WallIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Hopkins v. Van ZandtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- Hoffman & Garside v. N. C. Bignall & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.