Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schneider v. Toledo Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1964No. 38206Published

1DissentGibson, J.

Section 5731.02, Revised Code, levies a tax upon the succession to- any property passing to or for the use of a person, institution, or corporation in seven specified cases. Without question, at least one-half of the 28,700 shares of stock acquired by the decedent while he and his wife were domiciled in California belonged to decedent and thus is subject to the Ohio succession tax. The sole question before this court then is whether the Ohio succession tax should have been assessed against the remaining one-half of the 28,700 *145shares. The answer to this question requires an evaluation of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Fernandez v. WienerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API