Legal Opinion

Randall v. Estes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1949No. 13958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Chief Justice.

The rights of each of -the parties in this suit are controlled by the provisions of the will of Mrs. Willie Randall Estes. The appellants claim a vested contingent remainder in the estate of Mrs. Estes; the ap-pellee Albert H. Estes claims a life estate with absolute power vested in him'by the will to sell and in every other way to manage and dispose of the properties belonging to the estate, real and personal, “save and except by gift or devise;” and the appellee Paul Crum claims an assignment to 16½ acre-s of the estate perforce of an execu-tory contract of sale made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrell v. HickmanTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Crum v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Dickerson v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. C. C. Young Memorial Home for Aged Women v. NelmsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Jones v. WalterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Kelly v. LansfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API