Legal Opinion

Knodel v. William J. Boas & Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1936No. Appeal, 297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kelleb, P. J.,

If this case depended solely on the question of notice of claimant’s hernia, within the Act of April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, sec. 306 (g), we would affirm the judgment in his favor. He was foreman of defendant’s printing plant. About 10:30 o’clock in the morning of Saturday, April 30,1932, while he was prying up a heavy cylinder in a printing press, which had been jammed by an employe under him, he felt a sharp pain in the lower part of his abdomen, which made him feel sick or nauseated. He sat down and was not able to do any more work that morning. The plant closed at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Clairton School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Romesburg v. Gallatin MarketSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Mulligan v. E. Keeler Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Hopp v. Taub (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nemonich v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Mis v. Budd Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1957
  3. Scull v. Blosinski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API