Legal Opinion
Ricardo Carmichael v. Carl White
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1998No. 98-2775EMPublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAGG, Circuit Judge.
Missouri prisoner Ricardo Carmichael filed this federal habeas action asserting his 1997 probation revocation proceedings did not comply with procedural due process. In response, the State of Missouri asserted that Carmichael had not exhausted his state-court remedies under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 91, and that there is no time limitation for filing a Rule 91 petition. Carmichael conceded he had mistakenly filed his petition in federal rather than state court, and sought to have the federal action either held in abeyance or dismissed without prejudice. The district…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- James Yates Rust, Jr., A/K/A James Yeats Rust, Jr. v. Rex A. Zent, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Steven G. Slutzker in No. 03-4219 v. Philip Johnson Gerald J. Pappert Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., District Attorney, Allegheny County, Pa, in No. 03-4046Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Crews v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Bernard Cross-Bey v. James A. GammonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- KREDITVEREIN DER BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT FUR NIEDERÖSTERREICH UND BERGENLAND BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT AG v. CHRISTA NEJEZCHLEBACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Samar Akins v. Michael L. Kenney, Warden of the Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.