United States v. Clark
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOK, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of arson and housebreaking, in violation of Articles 126 and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 926 and 930. We granted review to determine if the military judge’s instructions to the court members on the issue of the voluntariness of appellant’s pretrial statement was prejudicial.
*179The issue is raised in the following context. During an Article 39(a) session,1 appellant challenged the admissibility of his pretrial statement. Special Agent Behr, Criminal Investigation Division (CID),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. HigginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. MewbornUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. GaetaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. AlfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. MillerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. GrandyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.