Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 24, 1989No. ACMR 8702683PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KANE, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of premeditated murder and rape, violations of Articles 118 and 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 918 and 920 (1982). His approved sentence includes a dishonorable discharge, confinement for life, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.

On appeal, the appellant assigns a number of errors. The appellant first contends that the military judge committed prejudicial error in failing to give sua sponte an instruction on the voluntariness of the confession. Second,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. BooneU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API