United States v. Thomas W. Donovan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
This case involves the admissibility of evidence obtained through court-authorized telephone wiretaps. District Judge *338Robert B. Krupansky suppressed evidence against the five named defendants-appellees on the ground that Government agents failed to comply with two statutory requirements. The Government appeals.
Essentially the basic question on this appeal is whether Congress meant what it said when it enacted Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520, permitting court-authorized interception of telephone conversations…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Alphonse CirilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Thomas Fury and John QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Mario GiganteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Kenneth VottellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.