Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Erberich

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 10, 1938No. 4-4868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This litigation arose out of a collision between a truck driven by appellee and an automobile driven by appellant at tlie intersection of Twentieth street and Rogers avenue in the city of Fort Smith. Both parties were severely injured, and, as is usual in such cases, each excused himself of the charge of negligence and blamed the other for having been negligent.

Appellant employed E. H. Patterson and the law firm of Partain & Agee of Yan Burén to sue appellee’s employer for damages for such injuries, and that suit was brought in the Crawford circuit court. Appellee brought this suit to recover…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morel v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Duckworth v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Northwestern Casualty & Surety Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Adcock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Progressive Life Insurance v. HulbertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Adams and Rusher v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Holifield v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Tri-State Transit Co. of La., Inc. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Gill v. Whiteside-Hemby Drug Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API