Legal Opinion

Northwestern Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rose

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 29, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This action was instituted by appellee against appellant, Northwestern Casualty &> ’Surety Company, to recover from appellant under an automobile liability insurance policy for sums appellee expended for medical bills and hospital bills for one Ben D. Bonner, struck by appellee’s automobile.

On the trial of the case the appellant took the position that it was not liable for medical and hospital bills because of the following provision in the policy: “The assured shall co-operate with the company at all times in facilitating the disposition of claims and suits, but shall not voluntarily assume…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morel v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Duckworth v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Smith Arkansas Traveler Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Murphy v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. United States Casualty Co. v. Johnston Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Yocum v. HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Pitts v. GreeneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Pate v. FearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Alsam Holding Co. v. Consolidated Taxpayers' Mutual InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
  5. Anderson v. ErberichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API