Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Krug v. Krug

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1973No. Appeal, No. 1665Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This is an appeal from the lower court’s holding that relatrix was not entitled to a support order against her husband for the reasons that (a) she had failed to prove adequate legal reason for her withdrawal from the common domicile; and (b) she had failed to establish by competent legal evidence her need for support.

It is our determination, after a study of the evidence, that these two conclusions of the court are not supported by the record or by law. The court did not refuse to believe the wife’s testimony but held it was insufficient. The court’s opinion was that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ross v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. SgarlatSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Rovner v. RovnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Cellucci v. CellucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API