Commonwealth ex rel. Krug v. Krug
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
This is an appeal from the lower court’s holding that relatrix was not entitled to a support order against her husband for the reasons that (a) she had failed to prove adequate legal reason for her withdrawal from the common domicile; and (b) she had failed to establish by competent legal evidence her need for support.
It is our determination, after a study of the evidence, that these two conclusions of the court are not supported by the record or by law. The court did not refuse to believe the wife’s testimony but held it was insufficient. The court’s opinion was that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ross v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. SgarlatSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth ex rel. Rovner v. RovnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth ex rel. Cellucci v. CellucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953