Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Rovner v. Rovner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1955No. Appeal, No. 168PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

TMs is an appeal by the respondent from an order of the Municipal Court of Philadelphia requiring him to pay $15 per week for the support of his wife.

The respondent contends that his wife separated herself from him without adequate legal reason and is thus not entitled to an order. Com. v. Sincavage, 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 457, 34 A. 2d 266 (1943).

The trial court found from the evidence that the wife had adequate legal reason to separate from her husband. It thereupon becomes our duty to examine the record to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pinkenson v. PinkensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. SincavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Myerson v. MyersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sosiak v. SosiakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Berry v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lipschultz v. LipschultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. O'Brien v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. McCuff v. McCuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Com. Ex Rel. Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API