Legal Opinion

Dorough v. Lockman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 17, 1961No. [No. 121, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Aggrieved by the verdict of a jury in favor of the driver and owner of the car which struck him, an eight-year-old boy appeals by his father as guardian, urging error in the trial court’s charge to the jury.

The boy had been playing with several other children on the lawn of his home and was bouncing a soccer ball against a stone retaining wall thirty-eight feet from the curb. The ball bounced back past him and on into the street, and he ran after it and was struck by the car. He could not remember whether he looked to see if a car was coming, or not. Other testimony would have permitted these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State, Use of Taylor v. BarllyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Cocco v. LissauCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Lenehan v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Nance v. KalkmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Finlayson v. GruzsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Alston v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. State, Use of Shipley v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Fowler v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Benik v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API