Finlayson v. Gruzs
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The jury found for the defendant driver in a suit on behalf of a boy almost five years old who was struck by her automobile. The claim on appeal is that the trial judge erred when he failed to instruct the jury as requested that if the driver “failed to exercise that higher degree of care that she would have to an infant than would ordinarily be required, then the jury’s verdict must be for the plaintiff.”
About six-thirty p.m. on a clear day in July 1957, the defendant, a housewife en route to her home nearby, was driving on Fenway North, a twenty-foot wide one-way street in a thickly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- State, Use of Taylor v. BarllyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Cocco v. LissauCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Havermale v. HouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Abbott v. Railway Express AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dorough v. LockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Lemons Ex Rel. Bankers Mutual Insurance v. Maryland Chicken ProcessorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Mulligan v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Alina v. RaschkaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Flyer v. Del BorrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.