Legal Opinion

Urbanski v. Manns

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,047PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

This is a proceeding by notice and motion for a nuno pro tune entry correcting the record of a judgment. Appellees sued appellant Urbanski for a debt and connected attachment proceedings therewith in the Harrison Circuit Court. Certain property of Urbanski was attached by the sheriff, who returned the possession of it to Urbanski upon *586liis executing bond with appellants Samuel J. "Wright and Lewis W. Bowling as his sureties, conditioned that “ said Urbanski shall properly keep and take care of said property, and shall on demand deliver to said sheriff of Harrison county the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Bales v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Latta v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Conway v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Newhouse v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wright v. MannsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Gray v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Ryon v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Runnels v. KaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API