Legal Opinion

Liddle v. Thompson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff sustained personal injuries and sued for damages on account of the alleged negligence of defendant in the construction and maintenance of a railroad grade crossing said to have been defective at the time of injury. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff and the defendant has duly appealed. The errors assigned and covered by the brief for consideration are (1) that the demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained; (2) that plaintiff was negligent as a matter of law; and (3) that plaintiff's instructions 1 and 2 were erroneous.

The petition states that on the 7th day of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stanich v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Gillioz v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Nixon v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Carruthers v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Blackburn v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alcorn v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission of Missouri v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Patterson v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Wabash Railroad v. City of WellstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. City of Higginsville Ex Rel. Kasco, Inc. v. Alton RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API