Mac Garrett v. State

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

In this condemnation case the land owner asserts there is no evidence or insufficient evidence to support the jury findings of the $55,000 value of the remainder of his land, not taken, immediately after the taking.

The actual question is narrower than this: it is whether there is no evidence or insufficient evidence that the value of the remainder was enhanced immediately after the taking, regardless of the amount. Of this, in our- opinion, there is adequate evidence. If the evidence shows the reasonable market value of the remainder was greater just after the taking,…