Philco Corp. v. "Automatic" Sprinkler Corp. of America
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
The question we have to determine is-, whether the district court correctly construed a construction contract so as to' deny damages which plaintiffs otherwise' would have been entitled to recover in this action. Specifically, the question relates to certain provisions in the contract, which according to the district judge limited the time within which plaintiffs could assert a claim for faulty materials •• and workmanship. The following is a summary of the facts.
Plaintiff Rex Manufacturing Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Philco Corporation,, operates a factory at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Koontz-Wagner Electric Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Niederhaus v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Wabash Life Insurance Company v. HackerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oxford Development Corp. v. Rausauer Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Smith v. Berwin Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Philco Corporation v. The 'Automatic' Sprinkler Corporation Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964