Legal Opinion

Thacher v. Moors

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 20, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Tort for the conversion of 184 bags of wool. Writ dated January 12, 1878. Trial in this court, without a jury, at September term 1879, before Ames, J., who reported the case for the consideration of the full court, in substance as follows: At the time of the transactions hereinafter stated, the plaintiff was a merchant, doing business in Boston under the name of H. C. Thacher and Company, and was engaged in buying, selling and receiving consignments of wool for sale on…

Read the full summary

Tort for the conversion of 184 bags of wool. Writ dated January 12, 1878. Trial in this court, without a jury, at September term 1879, before Ames, J., who reported the case for the consideration of the full court, in substance as follows: At the time of the transactions hereinafter stated, the plaintiff was a merchant, doing business in Boston under the name of H. C. Thacher and Company, and was engaged in buying, selling and receiving consignments of wool for sale on commission, and making advances upon said consignments ; and the defendant was a banker, doing business in Boston under the…

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

It is convenient to consider this case, in the first instance, as if Jones originally had no interest in this wool, and had none at any time except what he derived from the plaintiff, and then to consider what is the effect upon the rights of the parties of the facts, that the wool was originally bought by Fessenden “upon joint account with Jones, under an arrangement between them, by which Fessenden was to buy the wool of the farmers in Vermont, and Jones was to find the money (either furnishing it himself or procuring some one else to advance upon the wool) and have control of the sale of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Farmers and Mechanics' Nat. Bank v. . LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. McFarland v. WheelerNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  5. Stollenwerck v. ThacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rodliff v. DallingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Royle v. Worcester Buick Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Moors v. ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Keegan v. LenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Moors v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API