Legal Opinion
Hooghuis v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants New York City Transit Authority, Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated *817July 20, 1998, which denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valentine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Valentine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Bethel v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Palmer v. . Pennsylvania Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Urena v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rusin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015