Valentine v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs. We agree that, as a matter of *934law, insufficient time had elapsed after the end of this heavy storm to hold the city liable for failure to clear the sidewalks of snow and ice.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
2Cited by96 opinions
- Solazzo v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Powell v. MLG Hillside Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Newsome v. CservakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Lesser v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Candelier v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.