Legal Opinion
Baker v. Goetz
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 14, 1976No. Civ. A. 4072, 74-99 and 74-145PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEEL, Senior District Judge:
Three motions are before the Court. They are directed to substantially identical proceedings in each of the above three cases, hence separate treatment of each of the cases is not required. Civil Action No. 4072 will be treated as typical. One of defendants’ motions seeks an order specifically authorizing Jay H. Conner, the sequestrator appointed by this Court in each of the above cases (“federal sequestrator”), to turn over to the defendants “funds” paid to him under the order of his appointment and deposited by him in the Wilmington Trust Company. These…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baker v. GotzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Jones v. ClelandDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1981