MELESA v. State

Miller, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Evan Melesa was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in methamphetamine over 400 grams (OCGA §§ 16-4-8, 16-13-31 (e) (3)). Melesa filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Melesa contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, this court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. This court neither weighs the evidence nor judges the credibility…