Peacock v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Warren Peacock challenges the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his convictions for trafficking in methamphetamine, 1 conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, 2 and possession of methamphetamine. 3 Although sufficient evidence sustained his convictions for possession and conspiracy to distribute, we agree with Peacock that no evidence showed he trafficked in methamphetamine. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

When reviewing a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most…