Pemberton v. State

The appellant was prosecuted by affidavit and information for selling liquor to a minor.

The only questions presented to us arise upon the motion for new trial, and relate to the empaneling of the jury.

One John Howard was called as a juror, and upon his voir dire, stated that lie had no prejudice against the sale of liquors to be drunk as a beverage, if sold according to the statute; that such selling under a license was a legitimate business; that he would feel free to accept as true the testimony of one engaged in such business and give to it the same weight as to the testimony of others.

In…