Legal Opinion
Belair v. Lombardi
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 12, 1993No. 93-901-CIV-T-17BPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER, AMEND, CLARIFY OR CORRECT JUDGMENT
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on a motion to Alter, Amend, Clarify or Correct Judgment, filed by Plaintiff on August 13, 1993 and Defendant’s response filed September 15, 1993.
A motion to clarify an order as to the court’s intent regarding the continuation of state court proceedings is considered a motion to alter or amend the judgment, under Rule 59(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Birdsong v. Wrotenbery, 901 F.2d 1270 (5th Cir.1990). A motion to alter or amend a judgment is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Birdsong v. WrotenberyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Roque v. City of RedlandsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
- Leigh v. EngleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryant v. New Jersey Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Hood v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Greater Jacksonville Transportation Co. v. Jacksonville Port AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
- Brown v. HovatterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Schmitt v. HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020