Legal Opinion
United States v. Timiko Payton
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2010No. 09-3930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOD, Senior District Judge.
Defendant/Appellant, Timiko Payton (“Payton”) appeals the district court’s denial of a Motion for Sentence Reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Pay-ton’s Motion was based upon amendments to § 2D1.1(c) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“the guidelines”). Because the district court determined that Payton’s sentence was based upon U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, which applies to “career offenders,” rather than § 2D1.1, the motion was denied.
The facts and legal arguments presented herein fail to justify any departure from this Court’s established authority on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. GillisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. McNeeseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Joe WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Bryon ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Delano SandersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Dontez JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.