Legal Opinion

United States v. McNeese

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2016No. 15-5548PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

As a general rule, federal courts may not . modify a defendant’s sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). A statutory exception to this basic tenet authorizes courts to reduce a sentence that is “based on” a sentencing range that was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission (“Commission”). Id. § 3582(c)(2). But does that exception apply when a defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment set forth in a plea agreement executed pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C)? For years, this court held that a sentence based on a Rule…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. Terry L. PevelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. United States v. Todd BryantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. United States v. Carl GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API