Legal Opinion

Yarborough v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1976No. 20225PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

This action was commenced to recover benefits allegedly due under a group life and major medical expense benefit contract of insurance. The lower court, ruling without a jury, after a reference, granted a judgment representing hospitalization and other medical expenses in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant, insurer, has appealed. We reverse.

The plaintiff is the manager, in Rock Hill, of one of Ray-lass’ Department Stores. Raylass became a participant in a group policy offered by Phoenix, the insurer, in November of 1971. The master policy of insurance is voluminous and…

2Cited by43 opinions

  1. Schulmeyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Auto Owners Ins. Co., Inc. v. NewmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Silver v. Aabstract Pools & Spas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Stewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Univ. Underwriters Insurance Company v. Metro. Prop. & Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API