Legal Opinion

Haack v. Union Trust Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

From the facts stated we are of opinion that the learned county judge was justified in inferring as his written decision shows he did infer, that the testatrix signed at the house; that she and Schroeder then went to Dr. Scollard’s office and that the testatrix there acknowledged the signature to the will to be hers; and that the witnesses thereupon signed as witnesses in her presence and the presence of each other, as the attestation clause recites they did. The attestation clause should be given great weight after so long a lapse of time. Will of Lewis, 51 Wis. 101, 7 N. W. 829. “It creates…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Will of MareshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Williams v. MalmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hawkinson v. OatwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In re Gillmor's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrington v. SaxOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Moore v. HalberstadtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re Alexander's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Engberg v. AlexanderUtah Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API