Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Sax

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

The validity of the will of Mary C. Warren, deceased, is challenged upon the ground that it was not executed in the manner provided by law. The alleged will, dated November 29, 1926,- was admitted to probate in common form on January 9, 1929. The attesting witnesses were Agnes A. Lair and Ed Mendenhall. The attestation clause is in regular form and recites the execution of the will in accordance with the statutory requirements. At probate, Mr. Mendenhall, a lawyer , and the scrivener of the will, was unable to testify on account of serious illness. He died on August 10,1929, a month prior to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. German Evangelical Bethel Church of Concordia v. ReithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Stevens v. LeonardIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Kuehne v. MalachIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Skinner's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Jenkins v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Bragg's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Estate of Wallace v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Fann v. FannTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Williams v. SwordsMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ingraham v. MeindlOregon Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API