Legal Opinion

Tennessee River Pulp & Paper Co. v. Eichleay Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

The issue to be addressed is whether a contractual provision to arbitrate future disputes is revocable at will, in accordance with Tennessee common law, or whether it is irrevocable by virtue of the U. S. Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (hereinafter the Act).

On July 13, 1977, Eichleay Corporation and Tennessee River Pulp & Paper Company, hereinafter, called Tennessee River, entered into a contract whereby Eichleay, as general contractor, agreed to expand the production facilities of Tennessee River’s plant located in Counce, Tennessee. The contract price was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Robert Lawrence Co. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated v. Helen Echo HayduCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. In re the Arbitration between Rederi & Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frizzell Construction Co. v. Gatlinburg, L.L.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. GatlinMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ex Parte Alabama Oxygen Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. GAF Corp. v. WernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API