Legal Opinion

Sigur v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

from the Parish Court of East Baton Rouge, Robertson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSlidell, C. J.

This action is brought to recover from the defendant the-amount of fees and emoluments alleged to have been received by him as the Register of the Land Office, after the plaintiff, who superceded him, had been-duly commissioned and qualified. After an amicable request, to which the defendant refused to accede, the plaintiff proceeded by writ of mandamus to oust the defendant, and obtained a decree in his favor, as reported in 8th Annual, 422.

*298It is said by the defendant that there is no express warrant in our Code of Practice for such an action. This may bo true ; but we have no hesitation in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drach v. LeckenbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  2. Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. LaplaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. McCollister v. Police Jury of Sabine ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Palmer v. DarbyLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Stuhr v. CurranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API