Sigur v. Crenshaw
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the Parish Court of East Baton Rouge, Robertson, J.
1Opinion of the CourtSlidell, C. J.
This action is brought to recover from the defendant the-amount of fees and emoluments alleged to have been received by him as the Register of the Land Office, after the plaintiff, who superceded him, had been-duly commissioned and qualified. After an amicable request, to which the defendant refused to accede, the plaintiff proceeded by writ of mandamus to oust the defendant, and obtained a decree in his favor, as reported in 8th Annual, 422.
*298It is said by the defendant that there is no express warrant in our Code of Practice for such an action. This may bo true ; but we have no hesitation in…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Drach v. LeckenbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. LaplaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- McCollister v. Police Jury of Sabine ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Palmer v. DarbyLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Stuhr v. CurranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882