Stuhr v. Curran
Supreme Court of New Jersey
In error to the Supreme Court. The facts appear fully in fhe opinion of the court.
1Dissent
Beasley, Chief Justice,
(dissenting.) The legal question presented by the facts of this case is whether an officer de jure can maintain an action against an officer de facto, by reason of the intrusion of the latter into the office and the receipt by him of the emoluments.
In the opinion of the majority of the court the law does not afford such a redress, unless it is made to appear that such intruder was aware at the time of his taking possession of such office that he had, in point of fact, no legal title to it. In that conclusion I find myself, after a careful examination of the subject,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dolan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- People ex rel. Dorsey v. SmythCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Hunter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Glascock v. LyonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- People ex rel. Benoit v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.