Legal Opinion

Werner v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 26, 1950No. 10539PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

This case is before the court on motion of the United States to dismiss plaintiff’s “action for reformation of lease and reasonable rental for use and occupation of land” in Riverside County, California.

The material facts as alleged in the complaint are these. Prior to February 1, 1943, the land involved “was placed and held in trust by Mark L. Herron and * * * wife, as trustees, with directions and upon the understanding that said property would be returned” to plaintiff upon demand.

On February 1, 1943, the trustees, as lessor, and the United States, as lessee, entered…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Werner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  3. Albert Grabner v. Willys Motors, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Universal Transistor Products Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963
  5. Boccardo v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API