Bailey v. State

This case involves claims brought by plaintiff against the State of Oregon and other defendants for civil damages based on theories of false imprisonment, wrongful deprivation of liberty, and malicious prosecution after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted plaintiffs habeas corpus petition that challenged his underlying criminal convictions. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs claims with prejudice, and he appeals, advancing two assignments of error. In his first assignment of error, plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ ORCP 21 motions to dismiss. In his…