Legal Opinion

In Re an Arbitration in London, England Between Norfolk Southern Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 15, 2009No. 09 C 3092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.

Before me is a motion by Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, and General Security Insurance Company (collectively, “movants”) seeking an order to require Scott Carey, former counsel to ACE Bermuda Ltd. (“ACE”), to appear for a deposition in Chicago so that his testimony may be used in connection with an ongoing arbitration in London, England. Movants request this relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1782. For the reasons discussed below, I deny their motion.

The parties’ underlying dispute relates to insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. In Re Letter of Request From the Crown Prosecution Service of the United Kingdom, Thomas J. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. Republic of Kazakhstan v. Biedermann InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re Roz Trading Ltd.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
  5. In Re Application of Hallmark Capital Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chevron Corp. v. ShefftzDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  2. In Re Application of Chevron Cor.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  3. In re DubeyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API