Legal Opinion

(PS) Holmstrand v. Mercy Housing of California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 5, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02071Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUE ELLEN HOLMSTRAND, No. 2:25-cv-02071-DAD-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST 14 MERCY HOUSING OF CALIFORNIA, AND DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO 15 et. al., AMEND 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Sue Ellen Holmstrand proceeds pro se in this action which is referred to the 19 undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff has filed an 20 application in support of her request to proceed in forma pauperis which makes the showing 21 required by 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API