Legal Opinion

Mobile County v. Mizell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 31, 2003No. 2011080Published

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Mobile Circuit Court in favor of the employee, Claude Mizell, in a workers’ compensation case. The employer, Mobile County (“the County”), argues that it should not be liable for payments under Alabama’s Workers’ Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”), because, it argues, Mizell’s injury is a preexisting physical ailment. However, the trial court found that Mizell was able to perform his duties before the on-the-job accidental injury and that, therefore, there was no “preexisting condition” for purposes of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ex Parte St. Regis Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. CahelaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Holt v. Dunlop Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API