Mobile County v. Mizell
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MURDOCK, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Mobile Circuit Court in favor of the employee, Claude Mizell, in a workers’ compensation case. The employer, Mobile County (“the County”), argues that it should not be liable for payments under Alabama’s Workers’ Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (“the Act”), because, it argues, Mizell’s injury is a preexisting physical ailment. However, the trial court found that Mizell was able to perform his duties before the on-the-job accidental injury and that, therefore, there was no “preexisting condition” for purposes of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte St. Regis Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. CahelaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Holt v. Dunlop Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.