Legal Opinion

Holt v. Dunlop Tire Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 11, 1994No. AV92000599PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

On August 28, 1992, Joe Stanley Holt filed a complaint in the Madison County Circuit Court, alleging that he had suffered an injury to his rotator cuff in his right shoulder on January 23, 1992, arising out of and in the course of his employment with Dunlop Tire Corporation and seeking compensation for that injury. Dunlop answered, alleging that Holt had not sustained a job-related injury and that his disability, if any, was caused by a pre-existing injury that was unrelated to his employment.

On the day of trial, the parties stipulated that on January 23,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Blue Bell, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Reynolds Metals Co. v. StultsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. CagleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Kimbrell v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Mercy Medical v. KeaoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Mercy Medical v. KeaoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API