Legal Opinion

Burditt v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1998No. 72371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

Following a vehicle accident in which a pedestrian was killed, the investigating highway patrolman filed a report with the Director of Revenue concerning the driver’s condition. See sections 302.173 and 302.291, RSMo 1994.* The director ordered driver to take a vision examination and a driving skills test. Driver took the vision examination, but then filed a petition under section 302.311 alleging there was no good cause for him to submit to a driving skills test or examination.

The trial court found director did not have good cause to require driver to submit to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynes v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Schenk v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Pous v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Leaton v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Thomas v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API