Legal Opinion

Black v. De Rose

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00550Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL BLACK, Case No. 1:24-cv-00550-KES-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT (1) 12 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED; (2) THIS CASE BE DISMISSED 13 DENNIS DE ROSE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITH PREJUDICE, AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO 14 Defendant. AMEND; (3) AND THE CLERK OF COURT BE DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. 15 (ECF No. 12, 21) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Michael Black, proceeding pro se, brings claims of copyright infringement, 19 fraudulent misrepresentation, and mail fraud…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API