Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson-Anderson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2001No. 26467, 26468, 26469PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Elberteen Pearson-Anderson sought the suppression of evidence of methamphetamine obtained in a warrantless search of the home in which she was living. The district court denied Pearson-Anderson’s motion, and she was convicted of trafficking in methamphetamine following a jury trial. Due to this offense, the district court also revoked Pearson-Anderson’s probation in an unrelated case. In these consolidated appeals, Pearson-Anderson asks that we reverse the order denying her suppression motion and the order revoking probation.

I

BACKGROUND

Shortly after midnight on August 21, 1999,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Colorado v. BannisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. FrankelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BuntingIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. ReynoldsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. BarrettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API