Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 2008No. 24788PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Brian Wright attacks the validity of his guilty plea following an arraignment in which he was not advised of the mandatory minimum sentence as required by SDCL 23A-7-4 (Rule II). 1 Because Wright is relegated to plain error review and has not established prejudice, we affirm.

FACTS

[¶2.] Wright, his wife and four stepchildren lived in Rapid City, South Dakota. On September 13, 2007, Wright’s wife, B.W., found Wright naked in bed with her nine-year-old daughter, A.M., who was masturbating Wright. B.W. immediately reported the matter to law enforcement. Wright was arrested and later…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. BuchholdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. United States v. Hernandez-FraireCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. AppleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. AppleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API