Nieves v. Oswald
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
Once again we find ourselves dealing with the complexities of 28 U.S.C. § 2281, which has the deceptively simple heading in the United States Code of “Injunction against enforcement of State statute; three-judge court required.” That section and its “Federal statute” counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 2282, have been accurately described as creating many problems “so complex as to be virtually beyond belief.” 1 This case is a depressingly excellent example, since it presents not merely familiar and difficult problems of jurisdiction, but the added complexity of a last minute…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sostre v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Rhem v. MalcolmDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Sands v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Brown v. Liberty Loan Corporation Of DuvalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Morales v. TurmanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
- Brown v. Liberty Loan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.