Legal Opinion
Outdoor Graphics, Inc. v. City of Burlington
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 27, 1996No. 95-2913PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Outdoor Graphics, Inc. (Outdoor) appeals an adverse judgment in an action for damages and injunctive relief in this takings case. We affirm.
1. BACKGROUND
Outdoor asserts that the City of Burlington, Iowa (the City) deprived it of property without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, by enacting an ordinance that requires removal of its billboards from residential neighborhoods.
The City first adopted a residence district zoning ordinance in 1949. The ordinance required a landowner to obtain permission to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Armour and Company, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Inver Grove Heights, a Minnesota Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Albert J. Avenal, Jr., and 129 Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hawkeye Commodity Promotions, Inc. v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Outdoor Graphics, Inc. v. City Of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. American Leather Specialties Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Adams Outdoor Advertising v. City of East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Adams Outdoor Advertising v. City of East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.